Facilitating Decision Making | Isaac Fang

Facilitating Decision Making

50/70/90/100 How you perceive matters
April 2, 2019
Reading to the Right Side of Charts
July 12, 2019
Show all

Facilitating Decision Making

It takes time to crystallise something.

It takes effort to generate good content that withstands the test of time. There is a lot of information and data floating around on the internet. New information and updates in law or changes in geopolitics can make things irrelevant, more relevant or less so.

I aim to present timeless concepts and methodologies to my readers. Being a proponent of the design driven process, this post serves to demonstrate what it really entails. The craft, the customisation and personalised advisory service that takes effort and puts you as the client, at the centre of focus most truly.

The background for this is simply to prove that what is best, is unique to each individual as well as quantifiable based on that nuanced individuality. The situation calls for it because we are now living in a world with multiple considerations, competing priorities and budgetary resource constraints. How then to strike a balance and make a decision?

Here it goes!

OverviewFirst

Let us extract some observations.

  1. Everyone’s relevant factors and nuanced weighting will be different.
    • You are unique, like everyone else. (Irony)
    • Embrace your individuality
    • It is widely accepted that Singapore Savings Bonds (SSB) and Fixed Deposits (FDs) are liquid (ie rank 10 equally) but if simply because you can get hold of monies from FDs faster than SSB and as a result liquidity rank SSB 9.8 and FD 10, hey I got no issues with that.
  2. Total Weights must sum up to 100%
    • Be willing to make trade offs and take ownership of that.
  3. Not all factors are relevant (to you) having considered the trade offs.
    • Do not be afraid to assign zero.
  4. You have to put in effort.
    • The extent of the differential (10 vs 9.9) is up to you.
    • It takes effort to enter a figure into each box with deliberation and relativity assessment.

You can go deeper.

OverviewDeeper

Going into the granular, do get hold of the full benefit illustration (because now the guaranteed yield is specified upfront) and as much product information as possible (information junkie behaviour). Specifically for insurance, comparefirst.sg is a decent starting point to select some relevant products.

Here are some things to take note.

  • Tune up sensitivity for biases from advisor reps. (if you are running thru this with a few different reps)
  • Re-ordering a person’s priorities for a sales target is not a good thing.
  • Be open minded about blending.
    • It does not always have to be an Either-Or situation.
    • 30% A and 70% B can have best of both worlds. Combinations are infinite.
  • There is no best of all time, only best at that point in time.
    • New products and new developments may or may not impact assessment of “best” even when weightings and nuanced relevant factors did not change.

I am the kind of person, who can see that 2 persons with different nuanced weightings over same relevant factors, debating over the same product as adversaries, yet find both equally valid in their own individuality. In Clifton’s Strengths Finder, my strengths are focus, analytics, intellection, learning and individualisation. Took me a while to understand what individualisation means. But it struck me on realising how design driven process resonated with me when I understood its principles. I do not have the strength of woo (strength for salespersons) so that is why I tell people that I can give good advice but I can’t sell. A bit of an oxymoron, yes I am analytically personable. Here’s me pouring out my soul and letting the world know that I can help you think, and make a decision. It is not my nature to force issues down your throat or deploy any form of emotional blackmail to do something you are not comfortable with. That’s the truth. Enough said.

This methodology can be applied to plenty, know that it can lead towards specific advice. Last but not least, the advisor rep you are working with, who puts in effort to work this process through with you, deserves to be remunerated somehow. You know what I do, let me know how I can be of service.

Please follow and like us:

12 Comments

  1. […] the best plan at a given point in time, to be defined as a prospect’s weighted multi-factored preference expressed. The loyalty to firm contractual bind may restrict the representative to just stating,”Dear […]

  2. […] Planning, and if you would like some assistance from me (I use a design driven approach) using FDM methodology, do not hesitate to make an […]

  3. […] FDM Process. What is meaningfully relevant to you, ought to be recorded. Since we all want value for money, […]

  4. […] Retire Early. It has its fair share of detractors but in my personal opinion, it is an aspiration. Me being me, with the tendency to see others’ individual preferences and nuances, will not run… I might holler if you are starving rags and bones for its sake, otherwise yea, I am fine with FIRE; […]

  5. […] Facilitating decision making is what I do, but before that can be done, I make it a point to try and wear your skin and not just your shoes. That kind of makes me a lousy salesperson to be honest, but I am proud to deem myself as a good adviser from the processes and work ethics that I lay out for you learn, use and abuse. […]

  6. […] The industry is far from diagnostic which many people don’t realise, which makes the FDM process a tough sell because unlike a silver bullet, the process is not […]

  7. […] To make things complicatedly simple, there are a variety of ways to examine the situation before dis…Emotional considerations may render a less rational approach taken towards an issue, which has its validity in its own way. […]

  8. […] priority of building up the emergency funds tends to take a back seat versus other priorities. Take control and ownership of the outcomes of your financial planning priorities before your financial adviser representative does. Reordering a person’s financial priorities […]

  9. […] There is going to be more and more financial blogging sites springing up and you as the reader will have to separate the weeds from the wheat to discern biased marketing fluff from timeless applicable knowledge.  This post aims to be as wholistic possible and is proof that investment advisory is too multi-faceted to be presented in a linear written form hence the peppering of links to deliver a consistent message of truth. Every individual is unique and financial advisory is a craft. But there is a way to be as objective as possible while embracing the diversity of individual profiles. […]

  10. […] a reader, the next natural question would likely be along the lines of: ‘How do I easily distinguish between them?’, or ‘What […]

  11. […] of the direction of the planning and analysis becomes important. The weightage component of the FDM process ensures your uniqueness as an individual is expressed and taken into consideration. What is most […]

  12. […] Some are motivated to direct your attention with click baits that lead into another pathway. Understand your own priorities and take charge of them, or others will seek to reorder them for agendas that are not your […]

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

WhatsApp
%d bloggers like this: